I get that. His job is to play up the current administration. He got caught giving credit to the wrong Pres. If he was intentionally trying to trick us, i think he would have had an excuse ready. I think he was going off his bullet points and got fact checked. If they start coming up with excuses as to it actually being Biden’s victory even though we know its not, thats when it turns into lies. They are going to be occasionally wrong. How they correct the mistakes is what will separate them from the previous administration the same way trump, Sanders and Conway separated themselves from Obama’s administration with the way they handled being fact checked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Kind of his job. Not really scandalous.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

If we go by the last four years, then I guess so.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

The last four years ended just a month ago.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Nov 3 and Jan 6 was two months. Done appears to be relative.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Unless “children” can pay their own doctor and hospital fees, I would assume it would be the parents who make any final decisions about sex reassignment surgery. From the following article:

Gender reassignment surgery is widely restricted to adults over the age of 18.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/02/child-gender-
reassignment-rights-prevalence-world/

Politifacts backs up my assertion that parental consent is needed. This is basically conservative hysteria.

From the article:
Other, interventions like hormone therapy (partially reversible) or surgery (irreversible) won’t be considered until a patient reaches adolescence.

Even then, the Standards of Care stress that certain procedures should not be performed until a patient is old enough to consent on their own (typically 16-18 years old) and others should occur only once a person has received other treatments for a specific
time period.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...oes-law-say-about-children-and-sex-reassignm/

Leave it to Rand Paul to try and stir up controversy where none particularly exists. I think he objects mainly to Rachel Levine as an individual. The rest is a big pile of BS that the gov. isn’t necessarily going to want to step in.

 

I don’t think we have a rash of parents rushing their children into sex reassignment surgery even if they found a doctor who consented to do it, since as stated above, that doesn’t seem to be the medical standard of care.

“Even then, the Standards of Care stress that certain procedures should not be performed until a patient is old enough to consent on their own (typically 16-18 years old) and others should occur only once a person has received other treatments for a specific
time period.”

 

He was citing a clinic in England. Last time I checked, we had a falling out with England and separated our laws a few centuries ago. Nasty spat and everything. He was trying to conflate being a minor with being a three year old in another country. In his line of questioning, all minors are the same. Levine tried to explain this the issue isn’t black and white and she would be happy to explain her stance on this complex and nuanced issue. Clearly he doesn’t want to be in the same room as her. He wanted her to say there is no possible scenario where a minor of any age would be allowed to begin a transition of any kind. He was also trying to conflate any hormone therapy with genital mutilation. We perform circumcisions on babies and 13 yr olds every day in this country. So parents can make choices on life long elective surgeries. True to form, he tried to mansplain gender reassignment to a person who has gone through gender reassignment. Just like when he tried to mansplain viruses to Fauci.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Tell that to the Q followers who believe Trump will be inaugurated on March 4.