Yes it would also arguably put them all in an age bracket that more closely mirror the majority of Americans. Lets face it, a bunch of 80 yr olds don’t exactly have their finger on the pulse of the average American.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

The age limit should also apply to our elected officials too.


The truth is out there

 

What a bunch of Ageists! LOL. Some older individuals have more smarts than many younger chowderheads. Ginsberg was particularly sharp up until her death. I would have bet money that she could out think many a “younger” person that we are saddled with in congress today.

 

I only mention it because some of these oldsters can’t seem to step into the 21st century, and are making decisions based on a time long gone.


The truth is out there

 

Unfortunately, it’s not just some oldsters who can’t step up into the 21st century. There are plenty of law makers that are positively anachronistic, who happen to be younger.

 

Exactly. Times change. Laws have to change with it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Probably? We’re talking about the likes of Jim Jordan, Marjorie
Taylor Green, Rand Paul for starters, LOL and yes, some Democrats as well.

As you’re well aware, Ruth Bader Ginsberg had a distinguished legal career before and during her time as a Supreme Court justice. From everything I read she was well liked and highly respected by her fellow jurists. There is no indication that her mental faculties had diminished one iota up to her time of death.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_09-19-20

https://www.npr.org/sections/death-...h-bader-ginsburg-a-jurist-of-historic-stature

 

And you are qualified to make that judgement how? Brilliant legal minds would disagree but I’m sure you know better.

 

While I agree it was unfortunate that she had physical limitations and disease that kept her from from being fully present in person, there’s no indication that she wasn’t able to read the briefs and dictate or instruct her aides to relay her thoughts on a case from home or a hospital bed.

Her vast knowledge of the law, her years of experience before and while on the bench, her ability to reason and make inferences (I’m sure partly innate and the rest honed by rigorous training at law school- wasn’t it Harvard?) continued to serve her well even as she fought the infirmities that ravaged her body.

 

That sheriff is full of himself. The very idea that he thinks he can tell people how to vote. Florida man in action.

 

If I had been foolish enough to retire to Florida, like many people I know, first thing I would have said to my husband was, ‘This is why I didn’t want to move down south!’ Lol. But then again, I would be living in an area of Florida that was “blue”. I would roll my eyes and vote the way I wanted to.

 

https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/news/video/miami-beach-police-clash-spring-breakers-76607692


According to the new law, these college students are rioters and I can mow them down with my car if I want to, and it would be legal.

As to people voting how they want, I'm pretty sure the Constitution guarantees that, regardless of what you or that moron sheriff think. If you don't like that, I'm sure there's some other country that cracks down on people who don't vote the way you want. North Korea or Russia are good examples. Many Middle Eastern countries too.