Battle Royale Forums

Welcome to Battle Royale Forums. Join us today and become part of the growing group of survivors.

9-11 18th Anniversary

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by PepperAnn, Sep 11, 2019.

  1. Lindigo

    Lindigo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,142
    Likes Received:
    1,236
    No, the article I read yesterday said they did have plane parts. Some things took a few hops and landed a ways away, and some things rolled down an incline.


    FACT: Wallace Miller, Somerset County coroner, tells PM no body parts were found in Indian Lake. Human remains were confined to a 70-acre area directly surrounding the crash site. Paper and tiny scraps of sheetmetal, however, did land in the lake. "Very light debris will fly into the air, because of the concussion," says former National Transportation Safety Board investigator Matthew McCormick. Indian Lake is less than 1.5 miles southeast of the impact crater—not 6 miles—easily within range of debris blasted skyward by the heat of the explosion from the crash. And the wind that day was northwesterly, at 9 to 12 mph, which means it was blowing from the northwest—toward Indian Lake.
     
    #21 Lindigo, Sep 12, 2019
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2019
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Lindigo

    Lindigo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,142
    Likes Received:
    1,236
  3. Biffster

    Biffster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2014
    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    508
    Thanks for the link, but it really doesn’t explain WTC7 very well. If being a block away from WTC1 and WTC2 was all it took for a 47 storey building to collapse on itself, that building should have been condemned as a potential death trap long before.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Morgotha

    Morgotha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2012
    Messages:
    17,934
    Likes Received:
    1,141
    Maybe it should have been. Who knows? It seems most reasonable to say it fell down because of the Twin Towers explosions and not because of some top secret plot. What was in that building that would make it worth destroying *the whole building* for? If the government wants to take something from you, they'll just take it, there's no need to destroy a 47 story building.
     
  5. Jama

    Jama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,678
    Likes Received:
    1,454
    That's what I would call "overkill"
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice