West. Find an uninhabited island and make a living there.

My second choice would be north: there will be few people and walkers to worry about.

 

As long as someone unties my rubber dingy, I'd be happy on the moon.

 

"Going north" seems climately regrettable because REI and LandsEnd are probably not shipping winter-gear to Zombie-ZipCodes anymore. Planting seasons are always shorter, too.

So, if people need to rely on a steady and continuing source of foods, equatorial areas have rainfall, fresh water and eons of edibles (which gets to be important - seed stores are probably not delivering, either).

The only problem that Northern Climates solve is "lack of disease carrying mosquitoes". Of course, they substitute ticks, instead. Frostbite.

I'm surprised Hawaii isn't a coveted area - lotsa of good farmlands with eons of edibles. Predictable rainfall. Mild climate. Of course, there's nowhere to run beyond the sea if the place is zombie infested, but draw those critters out to sea with ship's bells or horns - let the tide take them to the Aleutians. Or maybe drop them off near Fukushima. But however many there are, there won't be masses more because travel agencies probably won't book any more Zombie Air or Norwegian Zombie Liner specials. Clear the islands, and croplands, water, temperate weather are available.

(By the way, I'd have traded the power-yacht for a real sailing vessel first and foremost. Carry enough for a launch MAYBE although oars solve all fuel-requirements.)

 

I'd go north, most of British Columbia is desolate, the mountains keep most of the Eastern zombies and people out, hardly any people or zombies to the north. All you have to worry about is the south, stay clear of Vancouver and you're good.

Even a few hours north of Vancouver is still very warm, sounds good to me.


South...you lose the mountains and then you worry about the hordes from central and south america, the hordes from the north and the hordes from the east.


Nooooo thanks